BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> AVN Petersons Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20350 (20 September 2007)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2007/V20350.html
Cite as: [2007] UKVAT V20350

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


AVN Petersons Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKVAT V20350 (20 September 2007)


     

    20350

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2007/447

    AVN PETERSONS LTD
    Appellant

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: MICHAEL TILDESLEY OBE (Chairman)

    SHEILA EDMONDSON FCA

    Sitting in public in London on 12 September 2007

    DIRECTION

    Under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a surcharge assessment dated 24 May 2007 in the sum of £911.31 and being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 as amended coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Peter Rollison for the Appellant and Jonathan Holl of the Solicitor's office of HM Revenue and Customs for the Respondents.

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision

    AND THE Appellant and the Respondents by their said representatives stating pursuant to the rule 30(8) of the said Rules as amended that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document in accordance with Rule 30(1) of the said Rules

    THIS TRIBUNAL FINDS THAT the Appellant does not have a reasonable excuse for the default, which resulted in the Respondents making the assessment under Appeal.

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is dismissed

    AND that there is to be no direction as to costs

    MR MICHAEL TILDESLEY OBE
    Chairman
    Release Date: 20 September 2007
    © CROWN COPYWRIGHT 2007


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2007/V20350.html