BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?

No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!



BAILII [Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions


You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> United Kingdom VAT & Duties Tribunals Decisions >> 2E2 Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKVAT V20940 (27 January 2009)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2009/V20940.html
Cite as: [2009] UKVAT V20940

[New search] [Printable RTF version] [Help]


2E2 Services Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2009] UKVAT V20940 (27 January 2009)

     
    20940

    LONDON TRIBUNAL CENTRE Reference No: LON/2008/640

    Copy sent to:

    Appellant/Applicant

    Respondents

    2E2 SERVICES LIMITED Appellant

    - and -

    THE COMMISSIONERS FOR HER MAJESTY'S REVENUE AND CUSTOMS Respondents

    Tribunal: Nicholas Aleksander (Chairman)

    J G Robinson

    Sitting in public in London on 14 January 2009

    DIRECTION under Rule 30(8)

    THIS APPEAL against a decision of the Respondents with respect to a Default Surcharge being a reasonable excuse appeal as defined by rule 2 of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 coming on for hearing this day

    AND UPON HEARING Paddy Behan of Vantis for the Appellant and Jonathan Holl of Solicitors Office, HM Revenue & Customs for the Respondents

    AND THE RESPONDENTS having withdrawn the default surcharge notices in respect of the tax payable on 31 July 2007, 31 August 2007 and 28 September 2007

    AND THE APPELLANTS having withdrawn their notice of appeal in respect of the remaining periods

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL having heard this appeal and having announced its decision and the parties present at the hearing by their said representatives stating pursuant to Rule 30(8) of the Value Added Tax Tribunals Rules 1986 that they do not require the said decision to be recorded in a written document

    AND THIS TRIBUNAL DIRECTS THAT this appeal is DISMISSED, with liberty to apply in the event that the amount of penalties due cannot be agreed between the parties.

    Chairman

    Release Date: 27 January 2009

    © CROWN COPYRIGHT 2009


BAILII: Copyright Policy | Disclaimers | Privacy Policy | Feedback | Donate to BAILII
URL: http://www.bailii.org/uk/cases/UKVAT/2009/V20940.html