BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you
consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it
will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free
access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
You are here:BAILII >>
Databases >>
Scottish Court of Session Decisions >>
William Rigg v Ross or M'Kenzie. [1623] Mor 5391 (29 November 1623)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1623/Mor1305391-014.html Cite as:
[1623] Mor 5391
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Found, That a parson provided to a benefice may have an heir.
Fol. Dic. v. 1. p. 365. Kerse, MS. fol. 139.*** Durie reports the same case:
In an action pursued by William Rig Baillie of Edinburgh, against the eldest son of Mr John M'Kenzie, parson of Dingwall, who was convened as behaving himself as heir to his father, by intromission with his father's heirship goods; it being alleged that he could not be convened hoc nomine, seeing his father was not a person of that quality who could have an heir, and consequently he could not be convened as intromitter with his heirship, and so to make him heir to a person who could not have an heir; seeing his umquhile father was neither prelate, baron, nor burgess, which were the three degrees of all the subjects who might have heirs. This allegeance was repelled, seeing the defunct was parson of Dingwall; for the Lords found, That parsons provided to the like benefices, albeit they were not of the degree of prelates, yet that they might as lawfully have heirs as persons who were infeft in any small annualrent, or in any small piece of land heritably, and who being comprehended under the name of barons or freeholders, had heirs, as also as burgesses, who, albeit but mean craftsmen, and of mean substance, yet they also had heirs.
Act. Pearson.Alt. Mowat.Clerk, Gibson.
Durie, p. 84.*** This case is also reported by Haddington:
In the action pursued be William Rig, against the aires and executors of umquhil Mr George M'Kenzie parson of Dingwall, it was alleged, That the defunct could have no aires, because he was neither prelate, baron, nor burgess.—It was answered, That being a beneficed man, he behoved to be reputed to be as a prelate; because the Lords had fand, that he who was infeft in any lands or annuairent might have an air, albeit he were na baron, but only an heritor.—In respect whereof the Lords repelled the allegeance, and fand, that he being provide to a parsonage might have ane air.
