BAILII is celebrating 24 years of free online access to the law! Would you consider making a contribution?
No donation is too small. If every visitor before 31 December gives just £1, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback] | ||
Scottish Court of Session Decisions |
||
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> Scottish Court of Session Decisions >> Balmagie v John Maxwell. [1633] Mor 13800 (7 December 1633) URL: http://www.bailii.org/scot/cases/ScotCS/1633/Mor3213800-032.html Cite as: [1633] Mor 13800 |
[New search] [Printable PDF version] [Help]
[1633] Mor 13800
Subject_1 REMOVING.
Subject_2 SECT. I. Who entitled to pursue a Removing.
Date: Balmagie
v.
John Maxwell
7 December 1633
Case No.No 32.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
In a removing pursued by the tutor of Balmagie against John Maxwell of Meikle Cocklick, the pursuer's title being a sasine upon a comprising; alleged, No removing upon this sasine, because he offered to prove that the pursuer was completely satisfied of the whole sums, principal and annualrents contained in his comprising, by intromission with the mails and duties of the foresaid lands, and that long before the expiring of the legal, so that he must count and reckon ante omnia. Replied, This exception of payment not competent in the removing, neither can be received to, delay the pursuer, especially the legal having expired above twelve years since. The Lords found the exception relevant and admissible hoc loco, as had been done in the like cases before.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting